COST COMPARISON
Actual Value or Default Value? A CBAM Cost Comparison
Which emissions value method you use in CBAM reporting directly affects how much you'll pay in certificates. In this guide we compare the two methods — for CBAM's overall framework, see our pillar guide.
The Difference Between Actual and Default Values
An actual value is an emissions figure calculated from your facility's own production data and confirmed by an accredited verifier. A default value is a reference figure the EU sets, based on sector averages, for exporters who don't provide — or can't yet provide — verified data.
Both methods are accepted in CBAM reporting, but which one you use shapes both your reporting workload and your final cost.
Why Do Default Values Create a Cost Disadvantage?
The EU deliberately adds a mark-up to default values — the intent is to encourage businesses to verify and report their actual data instead. As a result, default values usually come out higher than your facility's real emissions performance.
In practice, this means that if your production process's actual emissions intensity is below the sector average, using default values forces you to buy more certificates than you actually need.
The Competitive Case for Using Actual Values
If you run an energy-efficient, lower-carbon production process, documenting that with verified actual data translates directly into a cost advantage: fewer certificates needed, lower CBAM costs, and more competitive pricing in the EU market.
This isn't a one-off benefit — once your verification infrastructure is in place, it keeps delivering the same advantage every reporting period.
Which One Should You Choose, and When?
If your data collection and verification infrastructure isn't mature yet, default values can serve as a temporary starting point — but that means accepting a cost disadvantage in the medium term.
If you have reasonable confidence in your production process's emissions performance, investing early in verification usually pays for itself quickly.
Illustrative Comparison (Hypothetical Figures)
The table below is for illustration only; no actual data was used.
| Method | Emissions Intensity | Annual Volume | Total Embedded Emissions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Default Value | 8.5 tCO₂e / tonne (hypothetical) | 500 tonnes/year | 4,250 tCO₂e |
| Actual Value (Verified) | 6.2 tCO₂e / tonne (hypothetical) | 500 tonnes/year | 3,100 tCO₂e |
In this example, using the actual value reduces embedded emissions by roughly 27% — which translates into a proportional saving on certificate costs.
To see what this difference means in monetary terms through a concrete scenario, take a look at our CBAM cost calculation case study.
Start Your CBAM Compliance Journey Today
Let's define your business's CBAM exposure and priorities together in a free pre-assessment call.
